Barney Frank Vows To Push The Homosexual Agenda; Boxer And Pelosi Applaud (Video)
-
Those promoting the normalization of homosexuality have only been emboldened by the repeal of DADT and Barney Frank’s comments are proof of that. From CNS News:
Christians should be on notice as of today. This is a frontal assault on their values and their faith. Those of us who remain faithful to the Gospel and seek to stand on the firm foundation of what Jesus taught will start suffering consequences.
“Blessed are those who are persecuted because of righteousness,
for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” Matthew 5:10-12
The attempt to normalize homosexuality will likely mean that calling someone to repent, to share the Gospel with someone, will be considered a “hate crime”. There are Christians already being forced to be “re-educated” because of their views on homosexuality. This is to be expected so I am not really concerned about that part of it, I am deeply concerned that many “Christians” are helping to bring this about by supporting the normalization of homosexuality. To me, idolatry is the only thing that can explain what is going on and we get a powerful insight into what idolatry looks like in the Old Testament. For when idolatry and the evil fruit that it cannot but produce is tolerated, the righteous are persecuted.
“Manasseh was twelve years old when he became king, and he reigned fifty-five years in Jerusalem. His mother’s name was Hephzibah. And he did evil in the sight of the LORD, according to the abominations of the nations whom the LORD had cast out before the children of Israel. For he rebuilt the high places which Hezekiah his father had destroyed; he raised up altars for Baal, and made a wooden image, as Ahab king of Israel had done; and he worshiped all the host of heaven and served them. He also built altars in the house of the LORD, of which the LORD had said, “In Jerusalem I will put My name.” And he built altars for all the host of heaven in the two courts of the house of the LORD. Also he made his son pass through the fire, practiced soothsaying, used witchcraft, and consulted spiritists and mediums. He did much evil in the sight of the LORD, to provoke Him to anger. He even set a carved image of Asherah that he had made, in the house of which the LORD had said to David and to Solomon his son, “In this house and in Jerusalem, which I have chosen out of all the tribes of Israel, I will put My name forever; and I will not make the feet of Israel wander anymore from the land which I gave their fathers—only if they are careful to do according to all that I have commanded them, and according to all the law that My servant Moses commanded them.” But they paid no attention, and Manasseh seduced them to do more evil than the nations whom the LORD had destroyed before the children of Israel.
And the LORD spoke by His servants the prophets, saying, “Because Manasseh king of Judah has done these abominations (he has acted more wickedly than all the Amorites who were before him, and has also made Judah sin with his idols)”2 Kings 21:1-11
“Christians” who support the advancement of a Liberal agenda are helping to bring about the persecution of their brethren and they must be confronted on this. Jesus explicitly warns us about how we treat our brothers and sisters in Him.
31″When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his throne in heavenly glory. 32All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34″Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37″Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40″The King will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.’
41″Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink, 43I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44″They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45″He will reply, ‘I tell you the truth, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
46″Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” Matthew 25:31-46
Jesus taught us to love one another and a priority should be placed on loving our brethren without neglecting our neighbor. The political implications of Jesus’ teaching on this requires that Christians reject a Liberal social agenda and not support those who advance it.
Related Posts…
Flashback: The Democrats War Against Christianity Is No Surprise
Taking On Religious And Political Liberalism
4 Questions For Liberal Christians
The Myth Of Gay Monogamy And Why States Ought To Reject Gay Marriage
Hate Crimes About To Be Signed By Obama, Christians Get Ready For Democrats To Persecute You
Charles Spurgeon Understood Liberalism And The Threat It Posed ThenRelated posts:
About The Author
-
Advertise Here
-
-
-
-
22 Responses and Counting...
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Blue Collar Todd, Blue Collar Todd. Blue Collar Todd said: Barney Frank Vows To Push The Homosexual Agenda; Boxer And Pelosi Applaud (Video) http://bit.ly/hcCJLf #tcot #tlot #obama #dadt #bible #p2 [...]
[...] Clip HT: Blue Collar Philosophy. [...]
I've never understood why the bible okays incest and Christians can't tolerate gays?
The Bible does not say that incest is okay. It was prohibited by the Mosaic Law, and is rightly prohibited today. God permitted it for a period of time after the Fall, because the gene-pool was still strong, i.e. few, if any, mutations existed. Such marriages did not present the dangers that they do today. Also, it must be remembered that there were no other people for the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve to marry besides other sisters and brothers and, perhaps nieces and nephews. God, who never makes a mistake or an error, prohibited it when in His wisdom, the time was right. God interacts with us where we are; by that I mean that He permits things that are not necessarily His ideal; He has done this throughout human history, and He does this even today.
Sodom and Gomorrah was destroyed and yet the man sent there to warn them, Lot, slept with his two daughters and was forgiven.
We must thank God that He will forgive us, even of sexual sins. Lot was completely unaware when either one of his daughters laid down with him, and also when either one arose. So, Lot's sin was in getting drunk, and being out of control. The sexual sin belonged to the two daughters. Actually, Lot was not sent by God to warn the Sodomites. He chose to live there (Genesis 13:11.) That proved to be a serious mistake, for his spiritual life was compromised by living there. Thus his daughters were not raised properly to know YHVH. Later on, Lot was instructed by the Angels to get all of his family, including his sons-in-law, out of the city, and his sons-in-law (who were to marry his daughters) did not believe him due to his worldly lifestyle. It could be said that Lot's daughters did not have faith in YHVH to provide husbands for them.
No offense, but that is utterly ridiculous. That's like the drunk driver saying I didn't mean to cross the center lane and crash into the mini-van killing a mom and her three kids… please don't charge me with murder because my only sin was being drunk… I really didn't know… blah, blah, I really didn't mean to blah blah….
Sorry, that's NO excuse. If you get drunk, YOU ARE STILL RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT YOU DO!!!!
Besides, Noah got drunk too and manages not to sleep with any of his sons and he actually remembered when he woke up that one of his sons saw him naked and failed to cover him and then cursed him.
If it wasn't for Homosexuals, AIDS would not have been brought into this country, and would not have spread around the world at speed of modern passenger jets.
Utterly ridiculous? You are trying to mix apples and oranges. It is nothing like you suggested; obviously you did not read the Bible, and you did not read my post correctly. No one said that Lot was not responsible; indeed, I said that the sin of Lot was getting drunk. If he passed out while he was drunk, he was unconcious; and when a person is unconcious, that person is physically unable to do anything, for like the scripture says, Lot was unaware both when they laid down, and when they arose. Either way, the sexual sin belonged to the daughters. Lot is the one who was debased here. The daughters did the debasing.
Since you brought Noah into the discussion, let me say that the two instances are separate and totally different situations. First, the scripture does not say that Noah was passed-out (unconcious,) so that cannot be assumed. He was still drunk, but awake, which is why he was able to remember. What Ham did, was to "gaze with satisfaction" upon his father, i.e. in a lustful way. Noah "sobered up" and then realized that Ham had done this to him. As Ham had brought shame to Noah, Noah cursed Canaan so that Canaan would bring shame to Ham.
Utterly ridiculous? You are trying to mix apples and oranges. It is nothing like you suggested; obviously you did not read the Bible, and you did not read my post correctly. No one said that Lot was not responsible; indeed, I said that the sin of Lot was getting drunk. If he passed out while he was drunk, he was unconcious; and when a person is unconcious, that person is physically unable to do anything, for like the scripture says, Lot was unaware both when they laid down, and when they arose. Either way, the sexual sin belonged to the daughters. Lot is the one who was debased here. The daughters did the debasing.
Since you brought Noah into the discussion, let me say that the two instances are separate and totally different situations. First, the scripture does not say that Noah was passed-out (unconcious,) so that cannot be assumed. He was still drunk, but awake, which is why he was able to remember. What Ham did, was to "gaze with satisfaction" upon his father, i.e. in a lustful way. Noah "sobered up" and then realized that Ham had done this to him. As Ham had brought shame to Noah, Noah cursed Canaan so that Canaan would bring shame to Ham.
Unconcious enough to get a hard-on twice and impregnate two women on two consecutive nights? Bullshit! Please google the releationship between erectile dysfuntion and alcohol.
This is very simple. He is the father. He is supposed to be the responsible one. Good fathers do not get high with their daughters, therefore he as an adult should bear all the responsibility, not the children. The sins are on Lot for not being a good father, not the daughers. How difficult is that?
Not difficult at all, but certainly wrong. The daughters were of marriageable age, and they planned this, with the expected result.
One more thought, since you brought it up: Christians can and do tolerate homosexuals; we love them as people who are lost and need God's word. It is the homosexuals who are trying to force us to tolerate their sin, and it is the sin that we are not supposed to tolerate. God said it, I believe it, and that settles it for me.
God said don't mix wool and linen and not to eat meat with dairy, do you believe that too?
The ceremonial law was nailed to the cross, and superseded by the law of faith in Jesus Christ. One example of this, is Mark 7:1-23. Jesus is saying that following those 'external' laws such as the one you mentioned, were not going to make a man either righteous or unrighteous. The importance now, is the internal matter of the heart.
So the answer to my question is no?
Sir, I believe that God said it, yes, and I also believe that particular teaching has been superseded, and following it is no longer required.
Well I can't prove that god said everything in the bible with 100% certainty so I believe that discrimination against GLBT people is the wrong.
The Bible cannot be proven, as such, but it can be confirmed by the the historical record. In other words, Anything that is used to try to 'prove' anything else, must be of necessity, greater than that which it proves. There is nothing greater than God's Word. But if you really wanted to know, you would investigate, and you would find that history and science 'come along side' and are a witness to the truth. If you investigate, you will find that if you accept ANY ancient text as written by whom it claims, to be intellectually honest, you must also accept the Bible. This is called the SCIENCE of textual criticism. You may not have ever heard of it, but it is a legitimate Science, used for more than a century to verify historical texts. There are far, far more ancient manuscripts of the Bible than any other ancient text; the manuscripts are of far greater quality than any other ancient text. And it is shown that the Word has NOT changed over the years, but it is 99.99 % accurate, having only very minor copyist errors. No Bible doctrine has ever changed from the ancient texts. If you believe that Plato wrote his works, then to be intellectually honest, you must also believe the Bible, using the same standards to verify each. Have you ever examined archaeology? Every site the Bible names, exists and exactly where the Bible says it is. Did you know that the remains of the chariots of Pharaoh have been found in the Gulf of Aqaba (the Red Sea) exactly where the Bible says they are? It is on video, and I have seen them. All of the Chariots have 6-spokes except Pharaoh's which has 4-spokes. This is consistent with secular history. It depends on whether you want the Truth or not…..or if you want to believe in evolution, which even the scientists are now admitting is a fairy tale, or the Word of the Omnipotent God. Compared to the word of fallible men, who make mistakes all the time, I would rather go with the Word of God, who never has ever made a mistake. The Truth is available. The choice is yours…..when on Judgment Day, God asks you what you did with His Only Son, who gave His life for you, what will be your answer?
Will it be, 'I ignored Him,' or will it be, 'I believed your Word, my Lord, and I accepted Him as my Savior?' Again, the choice is yours; but I will, take Jesus all the time.
Would those chariot remains be the same ones that Ron Wyatt claims to have discovered?
LOL, that is good!!!!!
Leave a Reply