British Soldiers Cannot Shoot Taliban Planting IED's Unless The Threat Is Imminent

  • Apparently it is not an imminent threat when someone is attempting to bury an improvised explosive device (IED) or roadside bomb. Since this is the way the British military is viewing a member of the Taliban digging a hole for an IED, soldiers cannot engage the enemy. This policy may have helped cause the death of Sgt Peter Rayne. From the Telegraph:

    British soldiers who spot Taliban fighters planting roadside bombs are told not to shoot them because they do not pose an immediate threat, the Ministry of Defence has admitted.

    They are instead being ordered to just observe insurgents and record their position to reduce the risk of civilian casualties.

    The controversial policy emerged at an inquest into the death of Sgt Peter Rayner, 34, a soldier from the 2nd Batallion The Duke of Lancaster’s Regiment who was killed in October last year by an improvised explosive device as he led a patrol in Helmand Province, Afghanistan.

    Wendy Rayner, 40, disclosed that in the days leading up to his death her husband been told that it was not his job to attack insurgents laying bombs.

    Mrs Rayner, who lives with their young son in Bradford, told the inquest that the insurgents were being allowed to get away with the murder of British troops.

    She said: “They are not allowed to fire on these terrorists. If they can see people leaving these IEDs, why can’t they take them out? One officer even told him ‘I am an army Captain and you will do your job’.

    “We have lost too many men out there, they had seen people planting IEDs yet could not open fire or make contact with them. I believe strongly if people had taken on board what he was saying more he might have been here today.”

    Under the Geneva Convention and the nationally administered Rules of Engagement the 9,500 British troops in Afghanistan are told they can only attack if there is an immediate threat to life.

    A key part of the MoD’s counter-insurgency theory holds that it is more important to win over civilians by not killing innocent people than it is to eliminate every potential insurgent…

    Brilliant.

    Related posts:


About The Author

Leave a Reply

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required